On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 13:57:04 +0100, Conor
wrote:
>In article , Scott says...
>
>> When you say most maps do you mean paper maps? Computer software
>> should be capable of being updated more quickly than paper maps.
>
>Not really. It all depends on how often the software providers, such as
>TomTom, request the data from the mapping companies. They could get it
>every week and release new maps every week but there has to be a
>balance.
My point exactly. I think the balance should be shifted from
releasing new products to customer service for existing customers.
First it was second quarter then start of the third quarter.
>
>> The
>> very fact that there was an estimated date of completion means that it
>> was known about in advance.
>>
>Well as it was probably in the design and pre-building process for a
>good few years, I expect so.
>
>> Anyway I was using this as an example. Other posters have pointed out
>> changes made eight years ago.
>>
>Well on my Satnav, it doesnt show Tosser.St which has been there on a
>housing estate built 8 years ago.
Perfectly reasonable point.
>
>Have you filled in the forms on NAVTEQ/TeleAtlas to inform them?
URL please.
>
>No. Should I?
>
>OF COURSE YOU FUCKING SHOULD. Theyve obviously missed it and, like
>software companies, they cant know about the problem if people dont
>tell them.
I thought they were professional cartographers paid to update the
maps. You are saying it is some sort of self-help community. I dont
remember being told that when I first bought the equipment. Anyway
changes such as one way streets, no right turn restrictions etc have
to be published in advance.
>
>It does sod all good pointing them out in here and in forums. Tell
>NAVTEQ/TeleAtlas. Theyre the ones providing the mapping data.
Others have said they have notified errors only to see them ignored in
the next update.